homepolitics NewsExplained: Why the SC’s judgment on appointment of Election Commissioners being hailed as a landmark one

Explained: Why the SC’s judgment on appointment of Election Commissioners being hailed as a landmark one

The Supreme Court on March 2 quashed the existing system of appointment of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election Commissioners (EC), which is being done by the Centre, and ruled that appointment be done by a committee of PM, Leader of Opposition and Chief Justice of India.

Profile image

By Avishek Datta Roy  Mar 3, 2023 10:11:24 AM IST (Updated)

Listen to the Article(6 Minutes)
5 Min Read
Explained: Why the SC’s judgment on appointment of Election Commissioners being hailed as a landmark one
The Supreme Court on March 2 quashed the existing system of appointment of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election Commissioners(EC), which is being done by the Centre, and ruled that appointment be done by a committee of PM, Leader of Opposition and Chief Justice of India.

The apex court highlighted the need to insulate the functioning of the Election Commission from executive interference, observing that a party in power will have an insatiable quest to remain in power through a servile Commission.
Let's break down what happened...
The Court Verdict
A five-Judge bench of the Supreme Court directed for the formation of an Independent Panel which will advise on appointments of Election Commissioners, including the Chief Election Commissioner. ECI is a three-member body, comprising a CEC and 2 ECs.
As per the apex court, the Panel would comprise:
  • Prime Minister of India
  • Leader of Opposition of Lok Sabha or the Leader of the largest opposition party
  • Chief Justice of India
  • The Supreme Court wants this practice to be the norm till a specific law is framed.
    What The SC Judgment Highlights
    • Elections should undoubtedly be fair and the buck stops with the ECI to ensure its purity is maintained
    • In democracy, the purity of elections must be maintained or else it would lead to disastrous consequences
    • A person in a state of obligation to the state cannot have an independent frame of mind
    • Unrelenting abuse of the electoral process over time
    • A large section of the media has abdicated its role and become partisan
    • CEC and ECs: Current Appointment Process
      No specific legislation as of today. The President approves appointments on the advice of the PM-headed Council of Ministers. Article 324 of the Constitution vests the "superintendence, direction and control of elections" in an Election Commission consisting "of the Chief Election Commissioner and such number of other Election Commissioners, if any, as the President may from time to time fix.'"
      Supreme Court while delivering the judgment said, 'A party in power will have an insatiable quest to remain in power through a servile Commission.'
      What The Petitioners Wanted?
      • Appointment done solely by the Executive, practice incompatible with Article 324(2)
      • No law to regulate appointment of Election Commissioners
      • There has been inaction by the Government in not making appropriate law
      • Financial independence not enough to ensure overall independence
      • November 24 hearing: SC had questioned 'Speed' Of Arun Goel's appointment
        The apex court, during its November 24 hearing had questioned the lightning speed of Arun Goel's appointment as EC. The court asked, "Position vacant since May 15, why was it filled in a tearing hurry?''
        The Court added, "We don't have anything against an individual. This man, in fact, is excellent in terms of academics. But we are concerned with the structure of the appointment. On the 18th we hear the case, on the same day you move the file, and on the same day, PM says I recommend his name. Why this urgency?... It says based on the list maintained, there are 4 names that you have recommended. I want to understand that out of a vast reservoir of names, how do you actually select a name?"
        Why SC raised a red flag
        Former IAS officer Arun Goel who served as Union Heavy Industries Secretary in his earlier tenure sought a VRS 6 weeks prior to his appointment. VRS was approved on November 18 and his appointment as EC came through the following day. Goel took charge as EC on November 21. The Attorney General, who was representing the Government replied, "So that one who is appointed gets at least 6 years as Election Commissioner."
        An Election Commissioner can hold office for 6 years or till attaining 65 years of age, whichever is earlier.
        How the opposition reacted
        Congress spokesperson Randeep Surjewala tweeted in Hindi. He wrote, "The decision given by the Supreme Court is very significant. BJP’s conspiracy to weaken democratic values will never succeed."
        TMC MP Derek O'Brien tweeted, HUGE, So Extremely Compromised (EC) can again strive to become Extremely Competent (EC) (Reaction to historic Supreme Court direction for appointment of election commissioners)."
        Former CEC SY Quraishi tweeted, "At last SC has clinched it. The demand has been pending for two decades. Good for the perception of neutrality of the Election Commission."

        Most Read

        Share Market Live

        View All
        Top GainersTop Losers
        CurrencyCommodities
        CurrencyPriceChange%Change