Markets regulator SEBI on Wednesday floated a consultation paper and invited suggestions for the proposals on minimum public shareholding norms for bankrupt companies that undergo corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) and seek to relist following the process.
Sebi also proposed enhanced disclosures for such companies. It said that post-resolution, the public shareholding in such companies could fall sharply.
What are the proposals?
Sebi has proposed three options for such companies to comply with the minimum public shareholding (MPS) norms.
First, it suggested that post-CIRP, companies should achieve at least 10 percent public shareholding within six months and 25 percent within three years from the date when the shareholding had fallen below 25 percent.
Second, post-CIRP companies should have at least 5 percent public shareholding while relisting. Such firms may be provided a year to achieve public holding of 10 percent and further two years to achieve public shareholding of 25 percent.
Third, post-CIRP companies may be mandated to have at least 10 percent public shareholding at the time of relisting. Such firms may be provided three years to achieve minimum public shareholding of 25 percent.
Sebi’s discussion paper also suggested that the one-year lock-in requirement would be removed to help achieve MPS compliance.
What do current regulations say?
Under the present Sebi’s regulations, the listed companies must have at least 25 percent minimum public shareholding.
However, for companies undergoing an insolvency resolution under the Insolvency or Bankruptcy Code (IBC), the norms mandate that in case public holding falls below 10 percent, then the same will be increased to at least 10 percent within 18 months and 25 percent within three years.
For companies whose MPS falls below 25 percent but is above 10 percent then they need to bring it upto 25 percent in three years from the date when it fell below that mark.
Also, the shares of the incoming investors or promoters under the resolution plan stay locked-in for one year in terms of ICDR Regulations.
Why the change? What are the concerns?
The regulator is of the view that low public shareholding raises multiple concerns like failure of fair discovery of price of the scrip and need for increased surveillance measures and may, therefore, be a red flag for future cases.
Low float also prohibits healthy participation in trading of such companies majorly due to issues related to demand and supply gap of shares, Sebi said.
Any example?
Sebi observed a recent case (Ruchi Soya) wherein post-corporate insolvency resolution process, the public holding decreased to 0.97 percent, and the price jumped over 8000 percent in spite of additional preventive surveillance actions, including a reduction in price band and moving the scrip into trade-for- trade segment.
Till when can one send suggestions?
Sebi has sought comments on the issue till 18 September.
Check out our in-depth Market Coverage, Business News & get real-time Stock Market Updates on CNBC-TV18. Also, Watch our channels CNBC-TV18, CNBC Awaaz and CNBC Bajar Live on-the-go!
Lok Sabha elections: 4th phase sees over 68% voter participation, West Bengal leads with 76% turnout
May 14, 2024 1:47 AM
Lok Sabha elections phase 4 witnesses around 63% voter turnout, experts weigh in on key contests
May 14, 2024 12:06 AM
Lok Sabha Election 2024: Shiv Sena UBT’s Arvind Sawant highlights Uddhav Thackeray's vision for Mumbai’s progress
May 13, 2024 9:21 PM
Exclusive interview: 'Southern states will be a big surprise,' says PM Modi
May 13, 2024 9:05 PM