D-Street Diary: Small is beautiful for IPOs, DMart F&'No'

Chatter on the street is that it is a combination of expensive valuations, change in sentiment and last but not least, NBFCs becoming wary of lending funds to wealthy investors for large sized IPOs. One thing common to the Paytm and Star IPOs was the underwhelming response from wealthy investors—HNIs or high networth individuals—who bid for the non-institutional portion of the book.

More than fund managers, NBFCs appear to be getting edgy about valuations when the IPO size is large. The bigger the issue size, the more shares are likely to be allotted if the overall response is weak. That is not something NBFCs want. The higher the allotment, the more the NBFCs' funds are at risk on listing day. They are happier lending for small-sized IPOs, where demand is massive and shares allotted are a small percentage of the quantum bid. In such a scenario, NBFCs recover nearly all their charges even before the issue has listed.

Another reason for small IPOs doing well, say brokers, is that many promoters cut sweetheart deals with operators to ensure that their stock is in play for a while after listing.

Last week my colleague Anuj Singhal raised the question as to why DMart has not been included in the list of securities eligible for futures and options trading on the NSE. This despite the stock fulfilling all the four criteria for making it to the hallowed group. That raises another question as well: is addition to the F&O list an automatic process or does the exchange need the company’s permission before including it?

So far in 2021, the NSE has included 60 stocks in the F&O list. Not unusual during a bull market when prices are rising almost one way. A similar trend was seen during the bull market of 2007 as well. Many promoters crave to have their stocks in the F&O group, particularly the ones known to dabble in their own shares.

But DMart founder Radhakishan Damani would not be complaining about his stock not making the cut. He has been around in the market long enough to know that an F&O presence is a double edged sword. In a bull market, it amplifies the rise in stock price as traders load up on the futures for a small upfront margin. But in a falling market, it becomes a powerful tool in the hands of bears looking to hammer stocks.

Ideally, cash market prices should set the trend for the futures prices. But it is perfectly possible to manipulate the cash market price by influencing futures prices on either side. If some traders come together and hammer away at the futures in a coordinated fashion, it could push the futures price below that of the cash market price. This could trigger a reverse arbitrage wherein some investors may sell DMart shares and buy the futures for a quick arbitrage. The selling in the cash market could in turn depress the stock price, inviting further selling from nervous investors.

There is no disputing the soundness of DMart’s business model, and Damani’s ability to hold his ground in a fiercely competitive arena dominated by rivals with deep pockets. But valuation is a different matter altogether, especially now that market sentiment has turned for the worse. Having been at the head of bear legions raiding overvalued stocks during the market crash of 2008, Damani would only know too well what it feels to be on the other side of the gate when the bears come knocking.