homemarket NewsSEBI allows MFs to 'grandfather' excess exposure; here's what experts say

SEBI allows MFs to 'grandfather' excess exposure; here's what experts say

Market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has notified a new rule capping mutual funds (MFs) exposure to perpetual bonds, also known as additional tier 1 and tier 2 bonds. This naturally affects banks - which use this as a popular route to raise capital and also mutual funds - among their largest consumers who invest in AT-1 bonds seeking a higher return. G Padmanabhan, Former Non-Executive Chairman, Bank of India (BoI), Ananth Narayan, Professor, SPJIMR and Amit Bivalkar, Director, Sapient Wealth Advisors and Brokers discussed the likely impact on both.

Profile image

By Sonia Shenoy   | Surabhi Upadhyay   | Anuj Singhal  Mar 12, 2021 11:39:31 AM IST (Updated)

Listen to the Article(6 Minutes)
Market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has notified a new rule capping mutual funds (MFs) exposure to perpetual bonds, also known as additional tier 1 and tier 2 bonds. This naturally affects banks - which use this as a popular route to raise capital and also mutual funds - among their largest consumers who invest in AT-1 bonds seeking a higher return. G Padmanabhan, Former Non-Executive Chairman, Bank of India (BoI), Ananth Narayan, Professor, SPJIMR and Amit Bivalkar, Director, Sapient Wealth Advisors and Brokers discussed the likely impact on both.

Share Market Live

View All

“The valuation norms do look a little troubling. It could create disturbances but I think this will get sorted out. While there is a bit of a flutter in the market right now, the intent that SEBI has come out with is quite right. Firstly, we have seen that some of these instruments particularly AT-1 bonds are sometimes paradoxically riskier than equity. So, it is important that therefore the risk be curtailed, which is what SEBI has done. Secondly, sometimes these bonds don’t trade for a long time. So, in those cases can we assume that these bonds will get called in the next call date and therefore the fact that there should be alacrity in the way in which the valuations move is also something which SEBI is trying to address,” said Narayan.
Bivalkar believes liquidity or credit risk is a problem.
“The credit risk of the issuer has not changed. It is only that a two-year bond now is getting replaced by a 100-year bond. So the risk of capital being defaulted or downgraded remains unchanged. MF generally have a 5-20 percent kind of exposure for perpetual bonds across some of the bond funds, some of the banking PSUs, credit risk funds. This does not worsen the liquidity profit also as portfolio exposure is not higher than the double digits there. So I don’t think the liquidity is a problem or the credit risk is a problem," he said.
According to Padmanabhan, as of now, there are niche investors who get into this perpetual bond.
“The banks raising money through this route is getting further cannibalized. I don’t see much sense in valuing any bond as a 100-year bond. I think we need to be more nuanced on this. I hope SEBI will listen to the issues that the market is flagging and come out with adequate clarification,” he stated.
For the entire conversation, watch the video.

Most Read

Share Market Live

View All
Top GainersTop Losers
CurrencyCommodities
CurrencyPriceChange%Change