Tata versus Mistry: Mere existence of veto right has been misconstrued, says Abhishek Manu Singhvi

Singhvi said, "The entire case appears to have proceeded on the assumption that because Tata Trusts who have a veto power and affirmative vote power which has never been exercised in the 100-year-old history of the company, the mere fact that that power is there and that some informal discussions are held between the board of Tata Sons and the individual nominees of the trusts without ever exercising such veto power, that amounts to prejudice? That to prejudice of the gigantic kind which suggests that the company is liable to be wound up?"