Demonetisation: Goal posts continue to be shifted but the truth of its failure is blatant

The decline of the unorganised sectors impacts the demand for its own products. The largest component of this sector (in employment) is agriculture and it has faced a decline in incomes which has meant that the farmers are not able to repay their loans. Consequently, there have been large scale demonstrations by farmers demanding better prices and loan waivers. For months, normal banking work suffered —  banks were busy exchanging old notes for new ones. This impacted their profitability. Soon, the adverse economic situation led to an increase in NPAs also, adding to their pre-existing problems.

If the unorganised sector is factored into the calculation of GDP, the current rate of growth of the economy is less than 1 percent and not 7 -8 percent as the official data claims. The quarterly GDP calculations are based on the growth of the corporate sector, which does not fully reflect the organised sector and much less the declining non-agriculture unorganised sectors. International agencies do not collect independent growth data so their endorsement of the government data does not add value.

This low growth rate of the economy underlies the current economic problems – stagnant private investment, fiscal deficit at 95 percent of the annual target in the first five months of the year, tardy exports growth and inadequate employment generation. Of course, other factors (GST, external climate, rise in petroleum prices) are also responsible for these problems but demonetization is a major contributor.

No government admits mistakes. The spin doctors shift the goal posts. So we have heard of cashless to less cash economy and to formalisation of the informal economy. Since all the money had come back into the banks, the line changed to how that would help track the black income generators. Next, data was put out as to how the number of filers of tax returns had increased and that tax collection had risen.

To achieve a less cash economy other means can be used than the hugely damaging demonetisation. A lot of advance preparation is required for its success, namely, financial literary, electricity, internet, regulation and security. Further, little black incomes are generated in the informal sectors so how would their formalisation help? Yes, more tax is collected than earlier but the direct tax to GDP ratio has hardly increased.

The biggest misperception about the black economy is that ‘black means cash’. So, it was thought that if cash is squeezed out of the system, black would go. But cash is also used for circulating the white economy. Further, it does not stop the process of black income generation and can at best impact less than 1 percent of the black wealth held as cash. But since 99.3 percent of the demonetised notes have been returned, it did not even impact this 1 percent of the black wealth.

In brief, the drastic note shortage was short term and it is over but its long-term consequences persist.

Shift again, demonetisation is endorsed by the people — the party in power has won major state elections. This only means that the economic and political perceptions can diverge. The public accepted that `black means cash’ and demonetisation would eliminate the black economy. Two years down the road, the ruling party senses growing disillusionment and is shifting the goal post further to defocus public attention from demonetisation.