homeindia NewsLegal Digest | Why the court refused to stay govt's Fact Check Unit for social media posts

Legal Digest | Why the court refused to stay govt's Fact Check Unit for social media posts

Though the government's Fact Checking Unit would censor only 'Fake,' 'False,' or 'Misleading’ posts, these words could be the proverbial thin edge of the wedge to gag freedom of expression. Time alone will tell if the FCU would be fair and not become a spoil sport, writes Chartered Accountant and legal analyst S. Murlidharan 

By S Murlidharan  Mar 20, 2024 6:46:29 PM IST (Published)

4 Min Read

Case 1 : No stay on Fact Check Unit for posts in social media 
Kunal Kamra v. Union of India with connected cases, the Bombay High Court on March 13, vide a 2:1 majority verdict refused to stay the constitution of a Fact Check Unit (FCU) by the government of India to rein in misleading and fake social media posts on government businesses. Rule 3(1)(b)(v) of the IT Rules amendment 2023 empowers the government to establish a fact check unit and unilaterally declare online content related to the government's business on social media platforms as fake, false or misleading.
The social media intermediary then either has to remove the information or be ready to defend its actions in court if need arises. The dissenting judgement dubbed the move as censorship harking back to the post office bill of the nineties and thus trampling down the right of freedom of expression. The majority however didn’t think so in the face of the undertaking given by the government that the FCU will not strike against satire, parodies, political opinions and light-hearted humour.  
Though the FCU would censor only 'Fake,' 'False,' or 'Misleading’ posts, these words could be the proverbial thin edge of the wedge to gag freedom of expression. Time alone will tell if the FCU would be fair and not become a spoil sport.