homeaviation NewsView: Financing India's airline growth plans and why a rethink is required

View: Financing India's airline growth plans and why a rethink is required

With interest rates rising, the rupee depreciating and yields falling, some airlines are staring at a very real challenge. Namely, financing the growth. The old methods will not hold up. A rethink is required, writes aviation expert Satyendra Pandey

By Satyendra Pandey  Sept 26, 2022 10:29:11 AM IST (Updated)

6 Min Read

The last decade has seen voluminous aircraft orders by India’s airlines. Collectively India’s airlines are flying a fleet of around 600 aircraft. Over 80 percent of this fleet is on lease. Add to this an aircraft order pipeline of 850 aircraft which needs to be financed and deployed. For weaker players without the backing of a strong parent or a balance sheet, deploying and financing these assets is slowly emerging to be a challenge. And with interest rates rising, the rupee depreciating and yields falling, some airlines are staring at a very real challenge. Namely, financing the growth. The old methods will not hold up. A rethink is required.
Overdependence on the sale-and-leaseback
The sale-and-leaseback model was made popular by Indigo and driven by the three pillars of planning, volumes and pricing. Specifically, Indigo focused on two years of extensive planning including contingencies; a sizeable order of 100 aircraft in 2005 with several follow-on orders; and pricing on the asset that was expertly negotiated. Together, these helped the airline firmly establish itself in the India market. Other airlines soon saw evidence of this success and went ahead with their own large orders. But they focused only one or at best two pillars of the Indigo model. Sale-and-leasebacks were the primary method of financing the orders.
A sale and leaseback model (SLB) is where the airline acquires the aircraft at an attractive price and sells the aircraft to a lessor — ideally at a profit — and leases it back for its own use. The SLBs are important as they are cash generative and also help the airline with fleet flexibility. In addition, as the airline inducts new aircraft the operational costs — most notably the maintenance costs — remain competitive. Shorter fleet replacement cycles also enable the airline to induct new technology faster. But the flip side is that airlines are left with asset light balance sheets, over time they end up paying more for the asset. And where clauses are not fully provisioned for this leads to pain for both the airline and the lessor. This is a fact that is gradually emerging.